Next: Why Linux? | Summary |
In this study, several office suites for Linux are evaluated. They are:
Microsoft® Office® for Windows® is the market leader in this area,
and is used implicitly as a standard of comparison. However, I personally
have very little familiarity with the Microsoft products, and I am not going
to be making judgments of whether they are better or worse than the Linux
competitors. The term Windows competitor
means the product generally
used at the UCLA Mathematics Department for this function: not implying the
absence of additional worthy products for Windows.
The office functions being evaluated are these:
In addition, each suite is evaluated for general appearance and ease of configuration, as well as for resource usage.
All of the evaluated software was obtained as part of the SuSE Linux 8.1
Professional distribution (also available in the Personal edition).
A word is in order about the resource estimates. Installed
sizes are generally underestimates, since applications from a desktop suite
require extensive libraries and shared components from the suite, which are not
included in the size given. On the other hand, the virtual memory and resident
set size (RSS) both understates and overstates usage, because shared libraries
are included in both figures, which occupy memory only once even though they
are counted in the size of every suite member; but often services are provided
by separate daemons which cannot be identified and added to the sum.
Next: Why Linux? | Contents |