Selection | Checkout | Setup | Apps | Top |
My existing Sony Xperia XA2
Pioneer
(2020) has been a joy to use. But time marches on.
My carrier, T-Mobile, is rolling out
5G service, and is obtaining the spectrum to do this by cancelling 2G and 3G
service. The Pioneer can do data over LTE, but not voice over LTE (VoLTE).
That means it's going to be mute starting 2022-07-01.
Timeline of my pocket computers:
Model | Purchased | Upgrade Reason |
---|---|---|
To be determined | 2022-04-21 | (New) |
Sony Xperia XA2 | 2020-02-21 | Works, no VoLTE, 2G-3G service gone |
Samsung Galaxy S5 | 2015-04-15 | Works, elderly, no kernel updates |
Samsung Galaxy S3 | 2012-10-23 | No upgrade to CM-12 (Lollipop) |
Motorola Droid 3 | 2011-11-23 | Bit rot (memory failure) |
HTC G1 Dream | 2009-03-30 | Insufficient memory for CM-7 (Gingerbread) |
Barbet
This time around, my selection criteria for the new pocket computer are (in approximate order of importance):
The machine must have a CyanogenMod (LineageOS) version available. I'm not going to deal with vendor hacks of doubtful security, nor with usage restrictions that I can't bypass. See this discussion of kernel versions and security updates in recent CyanogenMod images.
At my house I get decent LTE (4G) service and unknown 5G, but 2G and 3G are being recycled soon for the 5G deployment. The new phone must be fully operational on 4G only. That means it must have VoLTE (voice over LTE) (which the Pioneer doesn't have). This time, unless there are serious problems, I'm going to insist on 5G capability also. Wi-Fi calling would be a big plus. (The Pioneer doesn't have that either.)
The carrier continues to be T-Mobile (GSM) in the USA. A phone that could do both GSM and CDMA would be rated highly, but of these two, GSM is more important to me, for use when travelling. GSM is widely available both abroad and in the USA.
The pocket computer must be unlocked, referring to the ability to flash
arbitrary software (vs. sabotaging operation with other carriers). I will
be putting non-vendor software on it, and I've had unpleasant prior
experience jailbreaking
locked phones.
I view HTML content a lot. The phone must have a nice display. It looks like modern phones are 130mm diagonal and 1920x1080px, which is total overkill.
At times I use the hand computer outdoors in direct sunlight, particularly for map navigation. It is quite important that the display be readable in that situation, even though its color and contrast may be degraded from its performance in artificial light. A transflective display (color) would be rated highly if available; so would flight capability of pigs. The backlighted IPS display of the Pioneer has been pretty good. The OLED display on the Galaxy S5 has been satisfactory but not wonderful, in sunlight.
I would like fairly long battery life, but assessing the battery life before purchase is hard, and published data often is on tests that don't match my (or any live user's) usage pattern, so the life actually achieved is substantially less than the product hype. The Pioneer's battery has way exceeded expectations. I hope the new phone will do as well.
The Galaxy S5 and Pioneer have a slot for a user-provided SD card; however, the Android permission system made it very hard for me to put anything useful on this card. I would still like a card slot on the new pocket computer.
Like most people, I have converted to using the pocket computer for photography rather than a dedicated camera, and I would like a decent camera. The F number, sensor pixel count, and focal length (physical size) are the key dimensions here. Optical zoom would be very nice but I'm not likely to get this. In product reviews the author's nitpicks usually refer to issues, like overall image brightness or color balance, that are controlled by the vendor-provided camera program and they aren't judging the camera itself.
Here is a list of features that are important, and that every modern cellphone is expected to have.
Wired headphones and Bluetooth A2DP are required for music listening. Every phone should have both. A 3.5mm stereo jack is preferred over a proprietary jobbie like on the HTC Dream.
I rely on the pocket computer for navigation and mapping. It must have a GPS receiver for this activity. All modern phones have GPS.
Photography with a rear-facing camera. Massive resolution is not needed; it's impossible for a cellphone to have optics to match the sensors that go into cellphones these days. Auto focus is important for jobs like reading barcodes, which is one of my major uses of the rear-facing camera. LED flash is a nice addition.
USB connection to the host computer, including Android debugging. All Android phones have this. File transfer without unmounting the SD card is desirable, but this is an OS issue.
For battery charging, phones (including the Pioneer) are moving
away from a micro-USB connector to USB-3.0 type C. My charger is
supposed to be able to negotiate fast charging
, but it doesn't
happen on the Pioneer. It would be nice if the new phone could do
this.
Here is a laundry list of features which would be nice but are not deal-breakers if absent. They are ordered by importance.
Water and rain resistance. The Galaxy S5 had IP67 (Intrusion Protection): essentially no ingress of fingers, tools or dust, and immersion 1 meter under (non-salt) water for 30 minutes. The Pioneer, unlike prior Sony models, was unrated. I hope that the phone I get will have a good IP rating like the Galaxy S5.
Adjusts the screen brightness according to the ambient light level, saving battery in low light while keeping the display readable as lighting increases. Most modern phones do this.
Video chat with a front-facing camera.
A lot of pocket computer activities depend more on operating system support than on hardware components. However, the point here is to pick the hardware. But we need to keep aware whether the operating system uses that hardware effectively.
Now I need to intersect the cellphones available on Amazon with the ones
that have LineageOS images. First on Amazon. Search keywords: unlocked
cell phone 5G
. Filter settings: Amazon Prime (implies fulfilled by
Amazon). As the seller, both Amazon and associates are allowed. OS: Android.
Filtered to a price range in $200-$700 (USD). Filter can't restrict to 5G
(only 4G 3G 2G). 131 hits.
Intersected with LOS availability, per the LOS download page. How to operate this page (they changed it since my last campaign): It lists all devices. Click on the hamburger (3 lines) in the upper left corner; you get a list of vendors. Click on one, and it expands to a list of marketing and chassis names. Click on one of those, and you see its builds page. Near the top there are links to device info and installation instructions.
The following list includes those which are fulfilled by Amazon and which have LOS images. All those without LOS are excluded. Some older models are excluded when a newer model has LOS, but I'm fairly sure that every manufacturer is represented that has some model fulfilled by Amazon and that has LOS.
Google Pixel 3 (128Gb flash), $280. SBSF Amazon. Yes LOS,
blueline
. Inception 2018-10-xx (hiss, boo). 4G LTE, 3G
CDMA2000, 3G UMTS, 2G GSM.
Google Pixel 3a XL (64Gb flash), $388. SBSF Amazon. Yes LOS,
bonito
. Inception 2019-04-xx (hiss, boo). 4G LTE, 3G CDMA2000,
3G UMTS, 2G GSM.
Google Pixel 5, $695. Yes LOS, Redfin
. Inception
2020-10-xx. Cell net: 5G, 4G LTE, 3G CDMA2000, 3G UMTS, 2G GSM.
Google Pixel 5a (128Gb flash 6Gb RAM unlocked, GSM only), $460, SB
Mobile Advance
FBA. Yes LOS, barbet
. Inception
2021-08-xx. Cell net: 5G, 4G LTE, 3G CDMA2000, 3G UMTS, 2G GSM.
Moto G7 Plus, $249, yes LOS, lake
. Inception 2019-02-xx.
4G LTE, 3G UMTS, 2G GSM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 (128Gb flash), $385, only 1 left in stock.
OK, which model is it? 5G? or other variants? There are LOS images
for Galaxy S10e S10 S10+ S10-5G. For S10, inception 2019-03-08.
Same inception date for the S10-5G beyondx
.
And steroidal Samsung Galaxy phones up to $1995.
Of these, the Google Pixel 5 and 5a look like the best choices. Here are negative comments about the others:
beyondx(S10 5G) does do 5G.
Most of this information is from the
LineageOS Devices List.
In the feature
column, numbers in parens refer to notes at the end
indicating other sources of information.
Feature | Pixel 5 Redfin | Pixel 5a Barbet |
---|---|---|
Vendor | ||
Product Page (2) | (Redfin) | (Barbet) |
Price on Amazon (1) | $695 (OV) | $460 (OV) |
Inception | 2020-10-xx | 2021-08-xx |
Chipset | Snapdragon 765G | Snapdragon 765G |
Architecture | arm64 | arm64 |
RAM | 8Gb | 6Gb |
CPU | Kryo 475 x8 core | Kryo 475 x8 core |
GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
Internal Flash | 128Gb | 128Gb |
SD Card | No slot | No slot |
SIM size | Nano 1x + eSIM | Nano 1x + eSIM |
Cell Family (5) | GSM HSPA CDMA LTE 5G | GSM UMTS CDMA2000 LTE 5G |
LTE Bands | (unknown) | B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/32/38/39/40/41/42/46/48/66/71 |
5G Sub-6 Bands | (unknown) | n1/2/5/12/25/28/41/66/71/77/78 (no 60Ghz) |
Screen | 150mm 1080x2340px AMOLED | 161mm 1080x2400px AMOLED |
Bluetooth | 5.x | 5.x |
Wi-Fi | 802.11 abgn,ac | 802.11 abgn,ac |
Other (6) | Finger Accel Compass Gyro Prox Light GPS NFC Qi USB-OTG | Finger Accel Barometer Compass Gyro Prox Light GPS NFC USB-OTG |
Front Camera(3) | 8Mpx; fixed focus, no flash | 8Mpx f/2.0 83° fixed focus, no flash |
Rear Camera (3) | 12Mpx (+flash) | 12Mpx f/1.7 77° (+flash) |
Rear Camera #2 (3) | 16Mpx ultra wide, no flash | 16Mpx f/2.2 119° no flash |
Battery | LiPO 4.08Ah non-rem | LiPO 4.68Ah non-rem |
Charging | Qi 12W or USB-C 18W | USB-C 18W |
Buttons + Ports | Does not have 3.5mm audio jack. | USB-3.1 type C, 3.5mm audio, power, volume |
Bounding Box | 145 x 70 x 8mm | 156 x 73 x 8.8mm |
Mass (3) | 151g | 183g |
Intrusion Protection | IP68 | IP67 |
Available colors | Just Black, Sorta Sage | Mostly Black |
product pagefor the Pixel 5 is from GSMArena; it's no longer on Google's site. GSMArena has a similar page for the 5a, in the likely case that its Google product page also vanishes.
Otheritem:
General comments: The Pixel 5 and Pixel 5a are very similar and comments apply to both except as noted.
always on.
Going through the major selection criteria and comparing the two phones:
Frequency bands (MHz) supported by the phones.
See this Wikipedia article
about E-UTRA, which is the formal acronym for LTE. It has links to various
tables, specifically deployments by region. In particular, here is a table
mapping supported LTE bands to regions where they are likely to work for
roaming.
Europe
(ITU region 1) includes Africa;
America
(ITU region 2) includes both North and South;
and Asia
(ITU region 3) includes Australia and India.
Both Pixels support all the LTE bands listed here and many more.
Barbet
All hail the king of affordable camera phonesby Jordan Palmer on Tom's Guide (2022-03-14)
His summary of good points: spectacular cameras, big bright display, and IP67 intrusion protection. Not so good features: not the latest chipset, sold only in USA and Japan, no inductive charging (which the Pixel 5 has). It would appear that models without the 'a' suffix are flagship phones while the 'a' suffix designates a less fancy and less expensive variant.
Snippets from the review:
5G sub-6which means that frequencies above 6GHz are allocated but this phone can't use them. He's talking about the 60MHz (5 millimeter) band. Ditto for the Pixel 5.
never got a false rejection.Whereas jimc's experience on the Sony Xperia XA2 is that the print reader gets dirty very fast and the rejection rate goes way up.
Summary: The Pixel 5a may not look all that new, but it's an easy-to-recommend smartphone. It takes the winning formula of the Pixel 4a 5G, adds a metal build and water resistance, and drops the price by $50. The only real knock against it is the Pixel 6 is a much better buy for not much more cash.
Likes: killer battery life; IP67; versatile, easy-to-use cameras; three years of updates; solid performance; crisp, bright display. Dislikes: no 90Hz display; processor not future-proofed. (This means that there are newer SoC's that Google could have used with more years of not being outdated.)
Snippets from the review:
Conclusion: While the phone is all-around good, it's that $449 price
tag that really makes the Pixel 5a stand out. I've enjoyed using it,
and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend it to anyone looking for a
sub-$1,000 phone that just works
.
5 stars 59%, 4 stars 14%, 3 stars 5%, 2 stars 4%, 1 star 19%. I'm concentrating on the bad reviews. Lots of people say it's awesome, which doesn't really warn me of problems I may encounter.
James posted a 5* review, but then got a bad update from AT&T…
Boris Sergeev ended up receiving the Japanese version. It's hard to figure out what aspect of the Japanese version is bugging him. Cap'n Redbeard explained it: some countries have a law that a camera must make a sound when taking a picture, apparently including Japan, and some photographers want to turn off the sound and can't.
Someone in India was sent the Japanese version, with a NEMA 1-15P power connector on the charger (type A for North America, Japan, etc.), which needs an adapter in India, which gives you 230V 50Hz and uses plug type C (Europlug), D or M.
A fair number of users dropped their phones, damaged the screens, and then had to deal with atrocious Google customer support. Some report that the phone was in a case. Some report that the Gorilla Glass was not damaged but the screen itself was cracked. Jimc is starting to worry about the fragile screen.
There are a lot of 1* reviews from people who had the international model, tried and failed to do 5G on AT&T. T-Mobile 5G is fine. There's something weird about AT&T's 5G net. Several people recommend that you buy direct from Google, to get the USA model. I may follow their advice.
I'm getting the Pixel 5a Barbet
from the
Google Store for USD $449 plus tax
(about $42), free shipping.
Accessories: It includes a Google-branded charger with a USB type C connector and NEMA 1-15 AC plug (type A, North America, Andean South America, Japan, unofficially China). Also a 1 meter USB-2.0 cable, type C to C. The charger delivers up to 30W, 3A (limited by power), and 20V (as negotiated, default is 5V). At night I need to charge two devices, and I have a nice charger with two type A connectors, but it doesn't negotiate fast charging with the Pioneer (via a type A to type C cable). Actually, for overnight charging, fast charging is not needed and slow charging is probably easier on the battery. So I'm going to continue to use that charger. When fast charging would be helpful, as when traveling, I'll bring the Google branded charger.
The Barbet is bigger than the Pioneer: 156mm vs. 142mm long. Am I going to have to get a bigger pouch again? The pouch's interior dimensions are 151 x 72 x 15mm (measured). I think there's enough elasticity in the stretchy end fabric to hold the phone. If I'm wrong I can get a new pouch later. Update: the phone fits the pouch perfectly.
Selection | Checkout | Setup | Apps | Top |